On January 20,2026, Makina Finance took a brutal hit when attackers drained its DUSD/USDC Curve pool, walking away with about 1,299 ETH worth $4.13 million. This wasn’t some slow bleed; it happened in seconds through a flash loan attack exploiting the MachineShareOracle price feed. If you’re providing liquidity in DeFi or holding stablecoin positions, this Makina Finance exploit is a stark reminder that even established pools like Curve aren’t invincible.
Ethereum Technical Analysis Chart
Analysis by Clara Sutton | Symbol: BINANCE:ETHUSDT | Interval: 1D | Drawings: 8
Technical Analysis Summary
To annotate this ETHUSDT chart in my balanced hybrid style, start with trend lines: draw a solid uptrend line connecting the swing low at 2026-01-03 around $2,400 to the peak at 2026-01-12 near $2,950 (blue, thick); then a dashed downtrend line from $2,950 on 2026-01-12 to recent low at $2,550 on 2026-01-28 (red). Add horizontal support at $2,550 (green thick) and resistance at $2,800 (red thick). Mark consolidation rectangle from 2026-01-15 to 2026-01-30 between $2,550-$2,750. Use fib retracement from uptrend peak to recent low. Vertical line at 2026-01-20 for Makina exploit event with callout ‘DeFi Hack Impact’. Arrows for MACD bearish cross and volume spike. Entry zone callout at $2,600 long with medium risk, stop below $2,550, target $2,800. Text notes on security risks.
Risk Assessment: medium
Analysis: Balanced chart shows support test but DeFi security risks from recent exploit add volatility; hybrid approach favors caution
Clara Sutton’s Recommendation: Consider low-risk longs on support hold, but prioritize secure platforms and tight stops—security first in crypto.
Key Support & Resistance Levels
📈 Support Levels:
-
$2,550 – Recent swing low with volume cluster, strong post-exploit test
strong -
$2,500 – Psychological round number aligning with 0.618 fib retracement
moderate
📉 Resistance Levels:
-
$2,800 – Prior consolidation high, current overhead barrier
moderate -
$2,950 – Recent all-time high in period, strong rejection zone
strong
Trading Zones (medium risk tolerance)
🎯 Entry Zones:
-
$2,600 – Bounce from support confluence with medium risk tolerance for hybrid long
medium risk
🚪 Exit Zones:
-
$2,550 – Tight stop below key support to manage DeFi volatility
🛡️ stop loss -
$2,800 – Initial profit target at resistance with 1:2 RR
💰 profit target
Technical Indicators Analysis
📊 Volume Analysis:
Pattern: spike on downside post-exploit, fading on recovery
Bearish volume divergence on pullback confirms weakness, watch for bullish pickup
📈 MACD Analysis:
Signal: bearish crossover in late Jan
Momentum shift down after uptrend divergence, potential oversold bounce
Applied TradingView Drawing Utilities
This chart analysis utilizes the following professional drawing tools:
Disclaimer: This technical analysis by Clara Sutton is for educational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice.
Trading involves risk, and you should always do your own research before making investment decisions.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The analysis reflects the author’s personal methodology and risk tolerance (medium).
The attacker kicked things off with a massive 280 million USDC flash loan, pumping 170 million into manipulating the oracle to fake skewed prices in the pool. That distortion let them swap assets at manipulated rates, siphoning out real value before anyone could react. Makina quickly paused the pool and urged LPs to withdraw, but the damage was done. DUSD, trading at $1.01 today with a 24-hour range from $0.9962 to $1.02, held steady post-exploit, dodging a full depeg but highlighting ongoing Curve pool vulnerabilities.
This DUSD/USDC Curve pool hack echoes past oracle manipulations, like those on other lending protocols. Liquidity providers lost big here, and it ripples to anyone exposed to similar setups. DUSD’s current $1.01 peg shows resilience, but that 24-hour low of $0.9962 proves how thin the line is between stability and slippage.
Comparison of Top DeFi Insurance Providers for Curve-Style Exploits
| Provider | Coverage Type | Key Risks Covered | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nexus Mutual | Community-voted Smart Contract Coverage | General smart contract vulnerabilities, exploits | Protocols seeking customizable, voted coverage |
| InsurAce | Parametric DeFi Exploit Protection | Oracle manipulation, flash loan attacks | Curve pools vulnerable to price feeds and flash loans like Makina’s $4.13M incident |
| Sherlock Protocol | Liquidity Insurance for LPs | Pool liquidity drains, LP losses | Liquidity providers in AMMs and Curve-style pools |
Sherlock Protocol’s Liquidity Insurance shines for LPs hit in pools, using multi-sig treasuries to backstop losses from manipulations. It’s encouraging to see protocols like these evolve; Unslashed Finance adds on-chain Smart Contract Insurance with staking incentives for cover providers, making it user-friendly for hedging Makina-like scenarios.
Breaking Down the Top Protections for Your Portfolio[/h2>
Let’s get specific on how these stack up against Curve pool vulnerabilities. Nexus Mutual isn’t just coverage; it’s a mutual where stakers vote on claims, fostering trust. For the Makina incident, their broad smart contract policies would likely encompass oracle feeds tied to pools. InsurAce goes deeper into exploit types, with dashboards showing real-time risk scores – ideal if you’re eyeing DUSD positions at $1.01.
Sherlock’s approach feels fresh: they insure liquidity directly, which hits home for Curve LPs. Imagine getting compensated without proving malice, just based on pool imbalance thresholds. Unslashed keeps it simple with fixed-premium covers, slashing bad actors’ stakes if claims validate. These aren’t pie-in-the-sky; they’re battle-tested amid rising hacks.
Armor. fi steps up with targeted exploit coverage that automates claims for flash loan drains, making it a go-to for anyone in Curve pools. Their fiat-backed reserves mean quicker settlements, crucial when DUSD dips to that $0.9962 low and you’re sweating liquidity. Risk Harbor Protocol Protection caps it off, blending oracle manipulation shields with stablecoin depeg policies; their dynamic premiums adjust to threats like the Makina hit, keeping costs reasonable at $1.01 peg levels.
Top 6 DeFi Insurance Options Ranked for Makina-Style Risks
| Rank | Protocol Name | Coverage Focus | Key Features | Relevance to Makina Exploit | Est. Premiums (Annual) | Website |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 1 | **Nexus Mutual** | Smart Contract, Oracle Manipulation | Community governance payouts, On-chain claims assessment, Custom policy creation | Proven coverage for oracle exploits & flash loan attacks; protects against $4.13M DUSD/USDC Curve pool drains | 1-4% of covered value | [nexusmutual.io](https://nexusmutual.io) |
| 🥈 2 | **Sherlock** | Liquidity Pools, Smart Contract | Multi-protocol protection pools, Rapid payouts, High coverage limits | Tailored for Curve-style pools & oracle manip; covers flash loan induced drains like Makina’s $4.13M loss | 0.5-2.5% | [sherlock.xyz](https://sherlock.xyz) |
| 🥉 3 | **InsurAce** | DeFi Protocols, Flash Loans | Instant claims, Leveraged covers, Cross-chain support | Direct protection for oracle manipulation in stablecoin pools; relevant for DUSD/USDC Curve exploits | 1.2-3.5% | [insurace.io](https://insurace.io) |
| 🏅 4 | **Unslashed Finance** | Smart Contracts, Economic Attacks | Parametric triggers, No-KYC claims, MEV-resistant | Focuses on flash loan & imbalance risks; shields against Makina-like $4.13M liquidity drains | 0.8-2.8% | [unslashed.finance](https://unslashed.finance) |
| 🔥 5 | **Bridge Mutual** | Pools, Oracle & Bridge Risks | Community-voted covers, Dynamic pricing, High APY staking | Covers Curve pool manipulations & oracle feeds; applicable to $4.13M DUSD/USDC incidents | 1-3% | [bridgemutual.io](https://bridgemutual.io) |
| ⭐ 6 | **Dewhales** | Parametric, Flash Loan Triggers | Automated payouts on triggers, Low premiums, DeFi-specific params | Parametric insurance for oracle & flash loan exploits; fast coverage for Makina-style Curve drains | 0.3-1.5% | [dewhales.com](https://dewhales.com) |
Sherlock Protocol Liquidity Insurance (#3) directly targets LPs, covering imbalances without endless audits. Unslashed Finance Smart Contract Insurance (#4) incentivizes honest cover providers through slashing, ideal for hedging $1.01 DUSD positions. Armor. fi Exploit Coverage (#5) excels in speed, with on-chain verification for Curve exploits. Risk Harbor Protocol Protection (#6) adds AI risk scoring for proactive stablecoin depeg coverage.
These aren’t interchangeable; pick based on your exposure. Heavy Curve LP? Sherlock or Armor. fi. Oracle worries? InsurAce or Risk Harbor. Nexus Mutual offers broad appeal for most DeFi users facing smart contract exploit protection needs.
Imagine riding out the next attack with coverage in place. DUSD’s bounce back from $0.9962 to $1.01 shows stablecoins can weather storms, but LPs need backups. Protocols are patching fast post-Makina, yet exploits evolve quicker. That’s where these insurances shine, turning potential wipeouts into recoverable dips.
Read the full story here:
https://t.co/LOFKNuhfS3
Getting covered feels straightforward once you dive in. Nexus Mutual lets you stake and vote, building skin in the game. InsurAce dashboards flag risks pre-exploit, like the MachineShareOracle flaw. Sherlock’s multi-strategy pools spread bets across chains, reducing single-point failures. Unslashed’s fixed terms suit conservative holders eyeing DUSD’s tight range. Armor. fi’s automation cuts red tape, while Risk Harbor’s AI keeps premiums tied to real threats, not hype.
Why Act Now on DeFi Insurance Exploits
The Makina Finance exploit clocked in at 12 seconds, faster than most can refresh a chart. With DUSD steady at $1.01, it’s tempting to shrug off, but that $4.13 million lesson lingers. DeFi insurance exploits coverage isn’t optional; it’s your edge. Start small: cover key positions, monitor via these protocols’ tools, and scale as confidence grows. Knowledge pairs perfectly with these shields, letting you LP boldly without the knife-edge fear.
Users who’ve layered Nexus or Sherlock report sleeping better through volatility. DUSD’s resilience post-$0.9962 low underscores why stablecoin depeg coverage pairs with exploit guards. Makina’s transparency helps, but your portfolio demands proactive steps. Dive into these top options, match to your risks, and keep building in DeFi with confidence.
About the Author
